Undermining the Theonomist Syllogism

March 16, 2016July 13, 2016 ~ Mike Lewis ~ 2 Comments

It seems to me that the Theonomist argument can be boiled down to the following Syllogism: P1) God does not change. P2) If the Law has been abrogated, then God has changed. C) The Law has not been abrogated. The Reformed Libertarian objection is with P2. This is not necessarily true. If the purpose for … Continue reading Undermining the Theonomist Syllogism

Biblical Government: Anarchy, Minarchy, or Statism? A Response

February 6, 2014May 23, 2014 ~ Mike Lewis ~ 7 Comments

Click for more in this series: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5 I ran across a series of articles lately on a blog called "The Kuyperian Commentary." The Article in question is titled "Biblical Government: Anarchy, Minarchy or Statism?" and was written by Adam McIntosh, a former missionary kid, and currently … Continue reading Biblical Government: Anarchy, Minarchy, or Statism? A Response